Many thanks for all these different ideas. Would the sensible thing be to program the notes in with my four octave midi keyboard and then get the device to play this?
#PHOSCYON VS ABL3 PORTABLE#
If I want something more portable I could get a Novation controller (8 knobs and a few pads) etc.įinally, with regards to inputting note data, I'm guessing i don't really want to be squinting at a step sequencer type thing (hardware or software). I could literally just use these to control the Audiorealism abl 3. The message I'm getting here is that automation is v important - this is what I would have thought.Īnother idea maybe.I also have an old Yamaha AN1X with 8 knobs on it. The reason I thought about the Volca is that I had a very quick go on a friend's and he has kindly offered to lend it me for a few weeks. I'm sure the sound of this could be beefed up with Live's effects. Richie, interesting about some of the CCs being automated in a Volca. I've fiddled around with the Jupiter 8 and the Moogs but I'm very lazy and can't get want I want with these! I already have Massive and Arturia v 4 collection. Login, the Cyclop sounds very nice and I love the Hive demo songs. The Roland TB-03 wow - very nice - not sure about the budget! I'm assuming stuff like that can be automated via MIDI? The cube modular thing looks good but I'm not very good at building things! At £90 this is what got me thinking about the Volca in the first place (£120). I got a demo of it recently and it is indeed very good. I'm sure I'll be sticking it through Live's effects anyway.Īngstrom, lots of people like the Audiorealism abl 3. I'm not after an exact emulation, just something better than Impulse really. Thank you everybody, some really useful info here. Hey guys, Follow me on Twitter - GlitchPsytrance Heres episode two from the Goa-Trance series were looking at that classic TB-303/Acid Lead sound, more specifically the sequencing that makes this machine so special.
#PHOSCYON VS ABL3 SOFTWARE#
Would having a hardware bass line be better for this? I'm guessing that I could then configure the controls on my Launchkey for other software plugins and Live effects. Creating Goa-Trance 2 - Quick and Easy Goa/TB-303 style Acid Leads with D16 Phoscyon 17:14. I am also looking at doing some live gigs. If I went down the hardware route, am I right in thinking there's no automation afterwards? The only stuff I could automate would be Lives effects on the audio? When using hardware like this in the studio, do you just keep redoing the filter sweeps etc until you have the take you want? I don't know how easy it is to get a good 303 take with filters and cut offs etc? I'm also guessing that the advantage of this is that i can then automate all these parameters in Live. If I went down the software route I would do hands on action using my Novation Launchkey which has loads of knobs and sliders. What are the benefits of the hardware v software route here? I then realised that I could get a Korg Volca bass for a bit more. Some of these plugins seem fairly expensive. Something similar to Rebirth led me to look at Phosycin, Ab3 and Muon Tau etc.
#PHOSCYON VS ABL3 PC#
I used to have Rebirth on PC but I'm now mac based.
I have followed tutorials using Operator but can't really get the sound I'm after. I am looking to add some 303 style bass to my tracks.
Apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere.
0 kommentar(er)
